Skip to main content
Institutional briefing programme opening for partner validation About the briefing programme →
Visionary Pathways VISIONARY PATHWAYS Request a Briefing

RESEARCH REPORT · IN PREPARATION

The Enterprise Financing Gap and the Case for Structured Pipelines

Ousman Touray, Founder18 min read[Publication date to be confirmed] ShareCite

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • 01The binding constraint is assessability, not the volume of available capital.
  • 02Lenders decline firms they cannot evaluate at acceptable cost, not firms that are unprofitable.
  • 03Standardised enterprise data lowers origination cost enough to change lending behaviour.
  • 04Guarantees work when paired with data discipline; alone, they subsidise existing behaviour.

1. The gap is not a capital shortage

The unmet financing need of formal micro, small and medium enterprises in Sub-Saharan Africa is estimated at $331 billion.1 That figure is usually read as a funding shortfall. Read alongside the liquidity held by regional banks, pension funds, and diaspora savings, it reads differently: as a failure of intermediation.

Capital does not reach these firms because evaluating them costs more than the resulting facility earns. The gap is an information and process problem expressed in financial terms.

2. Why firms fail to qualify

Firms are declined for reasons that have little to do with the quality of their business: incomplete records, informal governance, unverifiable receivables, and no history a lender can price. Each is remediable, and none is usually remediated, because no institution owns the preparation step.

A firm that cannot be assessed is indistinguishable, to a lender, from a firm that should not be financed.

3. What a structured pipeline changes

A pipeline with published standards changes three things at once: firms know what is required before they apply, lenders receive files in a comparable format, and both sides share the cost of preparation. Origination cost per financed firm falls, and the marginal facility becomes worth writing.

4. Implications for partners

For banks, the proposition is volume at lower acquisition cost. For DFIs, it is additionality that can be evidenced. For governments, it is a documented account of where regulation blocks otherwise viable firms. [Full analysis to be published]

CITATIONS

  1. IFC / World Bank Group, MSME Finance Gap, estimate for Sub-Saharan Africa.
  2. African Development Bank, Jobs for Youth in Africa, labour market entrant estimates.

INSTITUTIONAL BRIEFINGS

Research, policy briefs, and investment notes as they are published. No promotional email.

Research, policy briefs, and investment notes. No promotional email.

RELATED RESEARCH